2025 AGM Meeting Minutes

Day 1 Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4

 

 

Adopted Proposals

Two proposals were adopted at the 2025 ATI AGM:

 

  1. The following proposal from the Membership and International Committees:
    1. “The International and Membership Committees merge into one committee, which will be named Membership Committee.”
  2. The following proposal from the Nominations Committee:
Part 1: : The Call for Nominations be sent out at least 75 days in advance of the Annual General Meeting.
Part 2: Electronic Voting results will be tallied and reported before the close of the Annual General Meeting. Nominations Committee will send a notification of election results to Board and Committee Chair candidates. A subsequent report detailing election results will be available to all Members following the Annual General Meeting.
This proposal was consented to with the following unresolved concern about when chairs take over, as stated in Policies and Procedures (Section X.A). The Policies and Procedures Manual needs to address the concern that newly elected committee chairs might be expected to assume their roles prematurely for a Conference should the Conference occur after the AGM.

Membership Committee/International Committee Proposal

AGM Day 1

Proposal:
The International and Membership Committees merge into one Committee.

Presentation

by Tania Laughton

 

Rationale

One of the main purposes of the Membership Committee is to support and engage with ATI members. It works on expanding and communicating membership benefits, as well as creating social connections among the members.

 The purpose of the International Committee is to ensure that ATI members of all nationalities and languages can participate fully in all ATI activities and business. This also falls under membership benefits.

 For the past couple of years, MC and IC have been working together in organizing meetings with all of ATI's country groups to deepen connection to members, to provide updates on what’s happening in ATI, to share how ATI is working to promote and support its members, and to hear members' desires for ATI. Together, both committees are in communication with the country liaisons and meet with them twice a year. The two committees have been collaborating together so closely that they are overlapping. Practically speaking, it would be more efficient if we cut down on doubling up the work that two separate committees create: having double the meetings, two Communique reports, finding two Chairs and enough volunteers for two committees, etc.

 This is wonderful news! We have become a truly international organization and having two separate committees has become superfluous.

 The current procedures are listed below. Reminder that the procedures can be changed by the committee, and can be updated as ATI grows.

 

Text from Relevant ATI Policies and Procedures

 VIII. Committees

All committees are grouped in four branches plus working Groups.

7. International Committee (IC)
Purpose: to enable members of all nationalities and languages to participate in ATI
Tasks: International Committee (IC)
  • reflects on, develops, and implements ways to involve and include all members, especially non-English speaking ones, in all of the activities of ATI in an on-going way;
  • plans and prepares workshops on international themes for Annual Conference and General Meeting (ACGM);
  • responds to questions from other committees, the board, or members about international matters;
    • encourages contributions to ATI publications from members in all countries;
    • collects grant applications for international workshops.

 8. Membership Committee (MC)

Purpose: to increase the membership of ATI Tasks: Membership Committee (MC)

    • prepares materials to inform potential members of our goals and objectives;
    • solicits membership applications;
    • welcomes new members into the ATI community;
    • contacts lapsed members to encourage membership renewal;
    • sets up a monitoring system to track the reasons members join or leave ATI;
    • produces periodic reports to the board and membership on member feedback;
    • considers issues affecting membership and makes appropriate Proposals.

Clarifying Questions

 

  1. What will the name of the merged committee be:
    1. Answer: Membership Committee
  2. How will the projects of the IC & MC be joined? How do we ensure that the work of the IC continues?
    1. Answer: we are already working together. We have had a pilot project this year. Tania has been the only member of the MC for the past 2 years. This past year, Tania worked with the IC as co-chair. They organize country meetings every year, and they have been working on this together this past year. This past year, the two committees have been working together and covering all the tasks of the two committees.
  3. Is there a provision to ensure that the merged committee will always have at least 1 international member?
    1. Answer: at the moment, all the committee members of the 2 committees are international. After merging, we will work on procedures, and we can add a stipulation requiring that the committee will always include international members
  4. Do we currently have a policy or procedure that addresses a mandate for a particular membership of the IC or MC?
    1. Answer: there are no policies for either IC or MC, only procedures

Level I Discussion: Vision/Mission

 

  1. How does this proposal fit with ATI’s values?
  2. ATI Vision & Mission Statements were read by Kanae Tsuneki in Japanese
  3. Comments:
    1. The proposal is in line with our value of applying FM’s principles. It aligns with our goals of being an international community. It also reflects the value of using FM Alexander’s work in the structure and operation of ATI, as it is the best means whereby to encourage members to work together internationally.
    2. The proposal is in line with our value of respecting our members and the work they do. Combining the committees will help them do the work more easily and efficiently

Level II Discussion: Concerns

  1. Concern that there is no policy in place regarding the makeup of the IC that ensures that its membership is truly international
  2. Concern that combining the 2 committees will compromise or lessen the scope of the important work that the IC does
  3. Concern that the motivation to merge the committees is coming from a temporary circumstance that we don’t have enough members in the MC rather than an underlying structural issue. Concern that this is not the most effective solution for a serious issue
    1. Concern that we shouldn’t be regulating membership of a committee
    2. Concern that not merging the 2 committees is inefficient. Efficiency is an Alexander goal
  4. Concern that it isn’t stated that the new merged committee would have responsibility for managing translations
  5. Concern that we don’t have a list of the responsibilities of the proposed merged committee. We have the list of current tasks of the IC & MC - would the merged committee be tasked with the sum of all of the tasks of the individual committees, or would the task list be different?
  6. Concern that many of these concerns are actually clarifying questions. There wasn’t enough time in the Clarifying Questions section to answer these.
  7. Concern that by calling this committee the Membership Committee the international aspect would be lost

AGM Day 3

Expanded Rationale for Merging Membership and Nominations Committees

Presented by Tania Laughton and Rosa Luisa Rossi

 

Proposal

The International and Membership Committees merge into one committee.

 

Rationale

For the past couple of years, the two committees have been supporting each other, working together, and collaborating together so much that they are overlapping. All the projects of both committees will be part of the merged committee. As a pilot project for this year, the two committees acted in unison as one committee and all projects were completed.

 

Purpose of the New Merged Committee
  • To maintain and grow a vibrant international membership.
  • Tasks/Projects of the New Merged Committee:
    • Membership Renewals - In collaboration with the office
    • Languages and Translations - In collaboration with the office
    • Country Group and Country Liaison Meetings
      • Organize and host 6 country group meetings a year (All members are invited to their respective country group meeting)
      • Organize and host two Country Liaison meetings a year
      • When needed, find volunteers to be a Country Liaison
      • Explain the Country Liaison Guidelines to new Country Liaisons
    •  International Workshop Grants
      • To support and stimulate local ATI communities to work together
      • To support the organization of workshops in countries where ATI is less well-established
      • To encourage local or less-well known ATI teachers to give more workshops
      • To provide financial assistance for AT workshops occurring outside the USA or in languages other than English.
    • Awareness Week
      • In collaboration with the office
      • Helps promote AT, ATI, and members
    • Social Hour
      • Various times a year, in different time zones
      • To help members from around the world connect with each other

 

New Merged Committee Members:

  • Chair: Rosa Luisa Rossi (Switzerland)
  • Members:
    •  Ainesh Madan (India)
    •  Kanae Tsuneki (Japan)
    • Kirika Rotermund-Nakamura (Germany)
    • Malané Hofmeye-Burger (South Africa)
    • Maria Weiss (Germany)
    • Country Liaisons are also part of the merged committee. Moving forward there is a hope that there will always be representation from more than one country.

 

Member Statistics:

  • 50-55% of Members are from the US.
  • 45% of Members are from around the world.

 

The Good News:

Both Committees have evolved from their original purpose. A lot of what the Membership Committee has been working on the past couple of years is creating projects that bring the international community together and the International Committee has worked on projects that are considered membership benefits. The international community is participating more and more. We have truly evolved into a global community.

 

Additional information from Rosa Luisa – IC Chair

  • ATI Membership Committee (MC)
    • Committee Purpose and Overview: The Membership Committee works on supporting and engaging with ATI members. It collaborates with the ATI Office on annual membership renewal, along with maintaining and growing the membership of ATI. The Membership Committee also works on expanding and communicating member benefits, as well as creating social connections among the members.
  • ATI Policies & Procedures for MC
    • Purpose:
      • To increase the membership of ATI
    • Tasks:
      • prepares materials to inform potential members of our goals and objectives
      • solicits membership applications
      • welcomes new members into the ATI community
      • contacts lapsed members to encourage membership renewal
      • sets up a monitoring system to track the reasons members join or leave ATI
      • produces periodic reports to the board and membership on member feedback
      • considers issues affecting membership and makes appropriate proposals.
  • ATI Policies & Procedures for IC
    •  Purpose:
      • The purpose of the International Committee is to ensure that ATI members of all nationalities and languages can participate fully in all ATI activities and business.
    • Tasks:
      •  reflects on, develops, and implements ways to involve and include all members, especially non-English speaking ones, in all of the activities of ATI in an on-going way
      • plans and prepares workshops on international themes for Annual Conference and General Meeting (ACGM)
      • responds to questions from other committees, the board, or members about international matters
      • encourages contributions to ATI publications from members in all countries
      • collects grant applications for international workshops.
  • ATI Bylaws VIII. COMMITTEES
    • VIII.1. ATI has Standing Committees to do the ongoing work of maintaining ATI and its mission.
    • VIII.2. Members at an Annual General Meeting may create a Standing Committee to perform ongoing tasks for ATI and will define that committee’s duties and responsibilities. Members at an Annual General Meeting may also dissolve a Standing Committee.
    • VIII.3. Each committee, except the Nominations Committee, shall have a Board liaisons.
    • VIII.4. Each committee may determine its internal structure and decision-making process for itself.
    • VIII.5. Any ATI member may join any committee, with the exception of Ethics Advisory, whose members must all be teaching members and all elected by the membership. 
  • Having separate MC & IC greatly increased the number of meetings required and made it more complicated to coordinate efforts
  • Why are we proposing to name the merged committee the “Membership Committee”?
    •  The name of our organization is “Alexander Technique International” - the international part is in the very name
    •  In naming the committee, we don’t need to create additional redundancy
  • Rosa Luisa is fully motivated to lead the merged committee.

 

Clarifying Questions

  • Question to clarify that the name of the merged committee would be the “Membership Committee”.
    • Answer: yes. There may be a concern that the name is not listed in the proposal. We can bring this up in the “concerns” section of the process 

Level III Discussion: Resolving Concerns

  • Concerns brought up last week have been grouped, as follows, and were addressed in the presentation that Tania and Rosa Luisa just gave us
    • Concern about maintaining IC status and work
    • Concern about lack of clarity of the tasks of the combined committees
    • Concern that the merge could minimize the role of the MC
    • Other concerns include concern about regulating membership of a committee, and concern that it would be inefficient to maintain 2 separate committees
    • Concern that the name of the merged committee isn’t listed in the proposal
  • Clarifying question: if this proposal is adopted, what happens to the concerns? Is there a record of them and this process? Answer: if the proposed resolutions to the concerns resolves the issues, then the concerns are recorded in the meeting notes, but aren’t attached to the adopted proposal. If the proposed resolutions don’t resolve the concerns, any remaining concerns need to be brought forward. If someone stands aside, that is noted with the adopted proposal, but we aren’t yet at that point.
  • Concern that the motivation to merge the 2 committees is coming from the specific circumstances that we don’t currently have enough members for the MC. Response clarified that the merger is not proposed because of lack of volunteers, but rather, the committees have already been acting as a single committee, and keeping them separate imposes administrative burdens. If there were more volunteers on the MC, it would be even more cumbersome to maintain 2 separate committees.
    • The concern remains, because as part of the presentation, a lack of members on the MC was listed as one of the rationales for the merger
    • After further discussion, this concern was withdrawn.
  • Comment on natural evolution of ATI. At the founding of the organization, everyone intended for the organization to be international in nature. At a certain point in our history, we needed a separate committee to foster this part of our mission. However, at this point in our history, we are in a different place, and no longer need a separate committee. Our membership is international.
  • Concern: people who haven’t served on ATI committees don’t have a sense of how much work it is. There is a potential to burn out member volunteers. Any way that we can become more efficient makes us stronger
  • Concern about not adopting this proposal. The present 2 committee structure seems to imply that US membership is the norm and residence outside the US is something other, requiring a separate committee. Even the name “International Committee” doesn’t make sense - to someone living in Japan, the US is international. It is much more in keeping with our values to have one unified committee.
  • To resolve a stated concern: Suggestion that we add to the proposal that the name of the merged committee will be the “Membership Committee”. The proposal now reads: “The International and Membership Committees merge into one committee, which will be named Membership Committee.”

Consensus reached- the proposal is adopted

Nominations Committee (NC) Proposal

AGN Day 2

Proposal

Presented by Dianne Sales

 

Rationale and History

Nominations Committee procedures were set 30 years ago, prior to electronic communication becoming standard practice. Revisions are needed to update how Nominations interacts with the Board and Membership to reflect changes over the past 3 decades.

ATI has recently separated the Annual Conference from the Annual General Meeting. Balloting has taken place at the AGM, and the Conference has afforded Nominations a chance to recruit members for any Committee or Board Positions that remain open. Language revisions are needed to accommodate this recent change.

Policy Revision Discussion
  1. The Call for Nominations is required to be sent out 3 months (90 days) in advance of the Annual Conference and General Meeting.

 Current ATI Policy:

“Opens nominations at least ninety days prior to preparing the ballot;”

 Nomination Committee proposes the following policy revision:

The Call for Nominations be sent out 75 days in advance of the Annual General Meeting.

 2. Policies require that Nominations present the ballot results within 2 weeks of ballot date closure and prior to the Annual Conference and General Meeting. The policy requiring notifications prior to the Annual Conference and General Meeting should be deleted.

 Current ATI Policy:

“Communicates the ballot results to candidates within two weeks of the ballot date closure and prior to the Annual Conference and General Meeting.”

Nominations proposes that this policy be revised to:
“Electronic Voting results will be tallied and reported before the close of the Annual General Meeting. A subsequent report detailing election results will be available to all Members. “

 

Resources:

 Extract from current ATI Policies and Procedures: black type is procedure and colored type is ATI Policy which can only be changed by members at an AGM.

 9. Nominations Committee (NC)

To make the Nominations Committee responsible for elections (1994 Policy) Purpose: to find members for board and committee posts

Tasks: Nominations Committee (NC) in conjunction with the ATI Office

  • identifies when elections are required;
  • publicizes unfilled positions;
  • accepts recommendations of potential candidates from members;
  • approaches and encourages individual members to serve;
  • maintains a list of members willing to fill future vacancies;
  • opens nominations at least ninety days prior to preparing the ballot;
  • prepares a list of candidates for any elected offices of ATI and presents those candidates to the membership;
  • prepares ballots and tallies votes for elections and coordinates with the office throughout the process;
  • communicates the ballot results to candidates within two weeks of the ballot date closure and prior to the Annual Conference and General Meeting. (1994 Policy)

 

X. Elections

Every member in good standing can vote on Member Pages. Candidate and voting information is available to members in a timely manner. Electronic voting is cost effective and environmentally friendly. Decisions are made by a simple majority of those participating in the voting unless specified in the bylaws or policies.

 Notes from Dianne: for at least the past 4 years, the process has been operating this way. This proposal brings the process in line with what we have actually been doing.

 Clarifying Questions

  1. If a person has been on the ballot and they are attending the AGM, they will find out if they have been elected. If they are not attending, they will find out when the whole membership is notified. Is that the intention?
    1. Answer: I send emails to everyone who has been elected congratulating them and letting them know that they have been elected. However, that is not required.
  2. Is there anything in the procedures about notifying people if they have won an election?
    1. Answer: Not currently. Procedures can be altered by whoever is on the Nominations Committee according to needs of the moment. It becomes difficult to change if we put things into policy.
  3. The current policy reads “Opens nominations at least 90 days . . .” The new policy deletes the “at least”. Why?
    1. Answer: for brevity. The Board Secretary will need to revise the Policies and Procedures if this policy is adopted

Level I Discussion: Vision/Mission

  1. How does this proposal fit with ATI’s values?
  2. ATI Vision & Mission Statements read by Seong-Eun Kim in Korean
  3. Comments:
    1. This proposal speaks to our adaptability
    2. It speaks to our being present in the 21st century, with technology that we all use.We are remaining current and up to date
    3. Relates to values of honesty and consistency and having policies and procedures that are consistent with what we are actually doing
    4. Responds to what is the best means-whereby
    5. Proposal is consistent with our mission to create and sustain global means of communication, connecting with our membership  

Level II Discussion: Concerns

  • Policies & Procedures is a series of instructions for the committee. Once Dianne Sales is not chair of NC, I’m worried that timely notification of people who have won elections will fall through the cracks
  • I’m worried that 75 days feels too fast. It takes time for people to decide whether they can take on a role. We should keep the requirement for nominations to send out a call at least 90 days before the election
  • The language for the proposal currently reads “be sent out 75 days in advance of the AGM”. Perhaps we should clarify by changing it to “be sent out at least 75 days before the AGM”
  • I am concerned that 90 days seems too long, and 75 days seems reasonable
  • Clarifying Question: request for context about what informs the timeline of 90 or 75 days. Answer: the time is based on figuring out which terms are expiring, contacting current people filling the roles to find out if they are willing and able to run for an additional term; if not, is there anyone currently on the committee who could take on a chair role. After that, send out a call for nominations. Sending out the call for nominations 90 days in advance is too early - it gets lost in email. If the call isn’t close enough to the time of activity, people put it aside to deal with later and it gets lost.
  • If we were to change the dates of the conference or AGM in any given year, could that be a problem for Nominations timing? We are currently considering scheduling the AGM before the conference, and there is also a suggestion to have the AGM and conference at different times of year
  • Clarifying Question: what is the stated schedule in the Bylaws?
  • Concern about how many positions were open this year. It was wonderful that people stepped up to fill the positions. Did this happen because the Nominations chair was able to talk to people during the conference? If so, we should continue to have the ballot after the conference, because we need the personal contact at the conference to recruit people. The Committee Fair at the conference was really important in recruiting people to serve on committees and the board
  • Concern from a member of APC about the conference taking place before the AGM. Those on the APC may not be able to attend the conference because of the workload, and the workload is very hard for the office
  • Not every NC chair will be able to travel to the conference, so having the personal touch at the conference may not always be relevant
  • The Bylaws state that the results of the election will be posted within 1 week. We need to make sure that we aren’t out of compliance with our Bylaws. Clarification about Bylaws - only specifies results of Board elections, must be reported within a week.
  • Concern that we are getting sidetracked. There has been an ongoing conversation since 2020 about when the conference and AGM should take place. We should have a conversation about this in a breakout room during the break
  • Having served as NC chair in the past, another thing that takes time is preparing the ballot, which means asking for photos and bios from the candidates. This takes a significant amount of time and work.
  • Concern that we are making our policies too rigid. We need to be able to adapt to changing conditions without going through cumbersome processes - for example, going through Formal Consensus to change the call for nominations from 90 to 75 days. We could be hamstringing ourselves
AGM Day 4

Listing and grouping of concerns from last week's meeting

Policies and Procedures concerns:

  • The policies and procedures manual is instructions for the next committee. Concerned that procedures will not be carried through to the new chair. It's essential to notify candidates of election results prior to general announcement so they can take on the work.
  • Concern that we are making our policies too rigid. We need to adapt to changing conditions. We could be hamstringing ourselves. Policies could actually be procedures allowing greater flexibility.
  • We may not be in compliance with bylaws and they may have to be changed. Bylaws refer to board only. Clarifying that we are free regarding committee member elections
  • Does the bylaws schedule currently have a ballot timing (clarifying question) 

75 vs 90 days concerns:

  • Soliciting bios and photos for the ballot takes considerable time and needs to be factored in.
  • 75 days feel quite quick. Considering the job takes time, and 90 days allows more time for consideration.
  • Language needs to be clearer, indicating "by 75 days" and not exactly 75 days.
  • 90 days is too long. 75 days seems reasonable as sufficient time for considering new or ongoing job responsibilities. 

Order of Conference and AGM Concerns:

  • We are considering AGM's being placed BEFORE the conference, so this could raise concerns.
  • Would like to see the two events at two different times of year.
  • Was concerned by the number of open positions. How can those positions be filled. So pleased to see that it was possible. Could this be due to in-person communication at the conference? If so, then conference should be before annual general meeting. Personal contact matters for filling roles.
  • As an APC member, concern that conference is always before AGM, then those on APC may not be able to attend the conference. Please consider workload of office and APC "workers".
  • Concern that in-person contact is not always possible if nominations chair can't travel.
  • Timing as it relates to annual conference vs annual general meeting: If we were to change the timing of the conference or AGM in any given year, could this be a problem?

Revised Nominations Committee Proposal

Revisions in red

  • Part 1: The Call for Nominations be sent out at least 75 days in advance of the Annual General Meeting.
    • Rationale: The wording change addresses concerns about timing flexibility, while also recognizing that electronic delivery has provided nearly instant communications versus snail mail. It also allows Nominations Committee to set a flexible timeline that meets their changing needs.
    • Clarifying questions? None
  • Part 2: Electronic Voting results will be tallied and reported before the close of the Annual General Meeting. Nominations will send a notification of election results to Board and Committee Chair candidates. A subsequent report detailing election results will be available to all Members following the Annual General Meeting.
    • Rationale: The wording change addresses concerns about notifying Candidates for the Board and Committee Chairs about their election. It also recognizes the change to electronic voting at the Annual General Meeting versus a vote that occurs prior to it and the separation of the Conference from the General Meeting.
    • Finally, it allows Nominations flexibility to adjust to future changes in timing of the Annual Conference and Annual General Meeting.

 

Clarifying Questions

Are we specifying a time frame after voting closes by which results must be announced? Answer: that will be up to the Nominations Committee, to give them flexibility to respond as needed to circumstances

Level II Discussion: Concerns

  • If AGM is held before the conference, the newly elected board members and committee chairs could take their positions before the conference takes place. Would that be a problem? It could be challenging if there is a change in who is holding a conference-related position, such as the Site Committee Chair.
  • Wish not to hamstring future nominations chairs. This proposal is only to modernize carrying out of nominations and elections. With the discussion about the timing of the AGM and conference, we are getting outside the focus of the proposal.

Level III Discussion: Resolving Concerns

  • Regarding the concern that, if the AGM is held before the conference, we could have a situation where, for example, the Site Committee chair position turns over shortly before the conference.
    • The relevant section of our Bylaws is as follows:
      • “IV.5.1. Terms will begin on the fourth Monday of October, or at the close of business of the Annual General Meeting at which election results were announced, whichever is later. Each term will continue until the close of business of the second Annual General Meeting after the beginning of that term, or until the fourth Monday of October of that year, whichever is later.” This is part of section IV of the Bylaws, relating to Board positions
    • So if the AGM happens before the conference, that wouldn’t be a problem - the board/committee chair positions wouldn’t turn over until the end of October. We don’t do business at the conference, so it won’t be a bylaws issue if the conference is held at another time of year
    • The Board would take these issues into consideration when setting the dates for the AGM and conference
    • Bylaws only refer to Board members, not committee chairs and the changeover for committee chairs could be at a different date, determined by Policies and Procedures.
    • We could resolve this issue by approving a separate proposal specifying that we never have the conference after the AGM.
      • This topic is really outside the purview of this particular proposal.
    • Suggestion to resolve this issue by adding to the current proposal a statement that newly elected positions will become effective after the AGM or Conference, whichever is later in the fiscal year.
      • Concern about this proposed resolution: We cannot change a bylaw at this time. If we wanted to make this change, we would have to submit a separate proposal, with advance notice to the membership.
      • Since the start and end of committee chair terms is not specified in the bylaws, we could add to the current proposal: “Newly elected committee positions will become effective after the AGM or Conference, whichever is later in the fiscal year.” This would not be a bylaws issue.
      • The Policies and Procedures document discusses elections for board, committee chair, and EAC positions in section X
    • Suggestion to resolve this issue by adopting it with an attached unresolved concern about when new committee chairs assume their roles. This issue will be resolved through an update to the Policies and Procedures document.

Consensus reached to adopt the following proposal:

Revised Nominations Committee Policy Revision Proposal

Part 1: The Call for Nominations be sent out at least 75 days in advance of the Annual General Meeting.

 Part 2: Electronic Voting results will be tallied and reported before the close of the Annual General Meeting. Nominations Committee will send a notification of election results to Board and Committee Chair candidates. A subsequent report detailing election results will be available to all Members following the Annual General Meeting.

 This proposal was consented to with the following unresolved concern about when chairs take over, as stated in Policies and Procedures (Section X.A). The Policies and Procedures Manual needs to address the concern that newly elected committee chairs might be expected to assume their roles prematurely for a Conference should the Conference occur after the AGM.

Day 1: Saturday, November 8, 2025


Agenda

 

Caption/Transcription Instructions  3 min
Bienvenidos/Seeing Each Other  3 min
Virtual Meeting Guidelines  5 min
Meeting Intentions  3 min
Present & Consent to Agenda  10 min
Formal Consensus Roles + Advocate Info  10 min
Formal Consensus Brief Review  4 min
Membership Committee / International Committee Proposal: Presentation & Clarifying Questions  15 min
Screen Break  5 min
Membership Committee / International Committee Proposal Level I: Vision/ Mission  15 min
Membership Committee / International Committee Proposal Level II: Concerns  15 min
Pre-break announcement  1 min
Break 30 min
Announcements  4 min
Vision Mission Values Presentation and Discussion with Light & Lively  45 min
Agenda Planning Committee Ending Announcements  4 min
Meeting Evaluation  5 min
Seeing Each Other  1 min

 

The agenda was presented and accepted by unanimous consent.

 

Formal Consensus Roles

  • Agenda Planner: Marilou Chacey, Jennifer Mackerras
  • Notetaker: Rachel Prabhakar
  • Meeting Intentions: Kanae Tsuneki
  • Facilitator Part 1: Corinne Cassini
  • Facilitator P1 Asst: Cathy Madden
  • Facilitator Part 2: Marilou Chacey
  • Doorkeeper: Diana Bradley
  • Public Scribe 1: Dianne Sales
  • Public Scribe 2: Sara Goldstein
  • Peacekeeper: Renee Jackson
  • Advocate: Robin Gilmore
  • Teach Advocate: Kelsey Gomez-Morrissey
  • Language Advocate: Lucie Pierro
  • FC Advocate: Debi Adams
  • Becoming Community Light & Lively 1: Harold Rivas
  • Light & Lively 2: Robin Gilmore
  • Light & Lively 3: Ariel Weiss
  • Timekeeper: Amy Hack

Proposal to Merge the Membership and International Committees

Presentation, clarifying questions, level I and level II discussions - see section earlier in this document.

Vision Mission Values Presentation and Discussion

  • Introductory video was presented
  • This is not a proposal for this year, rather, Vision/Mission is gathering feedback in preparation for presenting a proposal in 2026
  • A poll was presented for meeting members to fill out during the meeting, and it will also be made available to all ATI members after this meeting
  • Breakout rooms for discussion of the poll questions. Comments and questions will go to the Vision Mission working group, and will be revisited at next weekend’s AGM

Day 1 Meeting Evaluation

  • Having the timer show on Zoom screen was very helpful
  • I love how formal consensus works on Zoom
  • I could have used more Light & Livelies
  • Appreciate the expert facilitation
  • Could the routine housekeeping information, such as caption/transcription info and formal consensus overview, be available as pre-recorded videos so that people can watch in advance and we aren’t using meeting time (people in different time zones are getting up very early or staying up very late to attend)
  • Appreciate Corinne’s facilitation - this is the first time she has facilitated a proposal
  • Please keep the facilitator highlighted
  • Questions about the use of AI to support us in notetaking. Environmental concerns, and concerns about where our words and information go. Need for a collective, informed decision together
  • If a document is mentioned, could a link be placed into the chat so that we can access it?
  • Appreciation for the Agenda Planning Committee, who work hard behind the scenes to make the meetings run smoothly
  • Appreciate the support the new facilitator got from the more experienced facilitators
  • Further evaluations may be added to a Basecamp thread, if you think of things after the end of this meeting

Seeing Each Other 

Meeting Adjourned


Day 2: Sunday, November 9 2025


Agenda

Caption Instructions Video 3 min
Bienvenidos/Seeing Each Other  3 min
Meeting Intentions  3 min
Present & Consent to Agenda  7 min
Formal Consensus Roles  7 min
Nominations Committee (NC) Proposal: Presentation & Clarifying Qs  20 min
Screen Break  5 min
NC Proposal: Level I Vision/Mission  15 min
Light & Lively  2 min
NC Proposal Level II: Concerns  20 min
Pre-Break Announcements  3 min
Break 30 min
Announcements  5 min
Board Report with Q & A  20 min
Light & Lively  2 min
Treasurer’s Report with Q & A  20 min
Agenda Planning Committee Ending Announcements  5 min
Meeting Evaluation  5 min
Seeing Each Other  1 min

 

The agenda was presented and accepted by unanimous consent.

Formal Consensus Roles

  • Agenda Planner: Jennifer Mackerras, Catherine Kettrick

  • Notetaker: Rachel Prabhakar
  • Meeting Intentions: Harold Rivas
  • Facilitator Part 1: Liz Talbert
  • Facilitator P1 Asst: Diana Bradley
  • Facilitator Part 2: Catherine Kettrick
  • Doorkeeper: Debi Adams
  • Public Scribe 1: Sara Goldstein
  • Public Scribe 2: Judith Saxton
  • Peacekeeper: Robin Gilmore
  • Advocate: Renee Jackson
  • Tech Advocate: Kelsey Gomez-Morrissey
  • Language Advocate: Rosa Luisa Rossi
  • FC Advocate: Cathy Madden Part 1
  • Becoming Community Light & Lively 1: Cathy Madden
  • Light & Lively 2: Judith Saxton
  • Light & Lively 3: Sara Goldstein
  • Timekeeper: Amy Hack

Nominations Committee Proposal

Presentation, clarifying questions, level I and level II discussions - see section earlier in this document.

Board Report with Q & A: Co-chairs Gaby Minnes Brandes and Renee Jackson

  • Gaby: This has been my fourth year on the board and the third as co-chair. First I observed and learned from Rosa Luisa Rossi and then co-chaired with Maria Weiss. Over the last year, I have had the pleasure of co-chairing the board with Renee Jackson.
  • Renée: This year was my second year on the board, as my first year was as a board director. I took a leap of faith and agreed to be co-chair this past year. I am indebted to Gaby for her wealth of knowledge, incredible writing ability, and patience with me as I learned to work on many diverse things in ATI. Some of the board will be rotating off this year along with Gaby, and I will miss them, even as I look forward to having the new ATI board members join us after the AGM.
  • Here is an overview of what kept us busy:
    • Maintaining weekly meetings of the co-chairs: Renee and Gaby met regularly as we responded to any ATI issues that arose and also considered the bigger questions: strategic planning, increasing numbers of members, checking in with members who have not renewed their membership, finding creative ways to invite members to be active, exploring new initiatives and projects within ATI and connecting with other AT organizations.
    • Examining the structure of the branches and committees we have made some organizational changes:
      • At this AGM we are discussing the proposal to integrate Membership and International Committee into one committee.
      • The Professional Development Committee suggested inviting the members of the Research Working Group to join PDC with its focus now moving to research;
      • The Agenda Planning Committee became a part of Guidance and Governance (per their request).
    • Supporting the various committees working on proposals
      • Completed projects:
          • Trademark was approved legally and we developed guidelines for members to use the trademark;
          • With the help of Julie Muvihill we developed copyrights procedures for the ExChange;
          • The board approved a Marketing Pilot Project led by Joseph Weissenberg, training members in producing materials to post online
          • Moving the Demonstration of Knowledge from a pilot project to an integral part of the ATI certification.
    • Ongoing projects:
      • We are looking forward to experiencing for the second time running the AGM separately from the conference. This year the conference was in Pendle Hill (in person) and the AGM is being held online over two weekends, allowing for people in different time zones to participate in the business side of our organization.
      • Ashley Adams trained board members in following up with members who haven’t renewed their membership in the last year. We used these conversations to listen to members’ needs
      • We were seeking creative ways to invite new members. The board discussed ways to connect with each ATI member once a year.
      • We continued to work closely with the office to seek efficiency and automate some procedures.
    • New projects and initiatives:
      • The board started working on a Strategic Plan that will move ATI forward with the help and leadership of Naomi Calvo, Rachel Prabhakar’s sister who is donating her time to ATI as a way of giving back for the lessons she received from Tommy Thompson years ago;
      • V/M Working Group has been revising our Vision and Mission in preparation for a proposal for 2026 and will support our strategic planning.
      • Supporting the Ethics Advisory Committee when they begin to work on the Statement of Belonging, access and Non-discrimination, specifically looking at the procedures that will follow the policy. We look forward to fruitful discussions with members in preparation for Formal Consensus in 2026.
      • We are working on creating bridges between ATI and the Affiliated Societies. We have had a productive meeting at the Congress in Dublin and are looking for the next steps ahead.
  • Gaby: My time on the board has been rewarding and rich. I have a deeper understanding and appreciation of ATI and its vision and mission. I have worked towards creating bridges between ATI and the Affiliated Societies and I am looking forward to continuing to support ATI and work for its values after finishing my term as co-chair. We look forward to seeing you all online at the AGM. We encourage everyone to find ways to contribute to ATI so that we all benefit from each other
  • No questions

Treasurer's Report with Q & A

  1. 2025 Operational Budget Current Year To Date
    1. Income:
      1. Member Dues: $59,154.00
      2. Donations: $823.00
      3. Certification Fees: $920.00
      4. TOTAL INCOME YEAR TO DATE: $60,897.00
    2. Expenses:
      1. Synergos: $50,860.00
      2. Credit Card Fees: $3,376.92
      3. Miscellaneous Business Costs (ExChange, translations, tech etc): ~$10,500.00
      4. TOTAL EXPENSES YEAR TO DATE: $64,736.92
  2. 2025 Conference Budget
    1. Conference Income
      1. $37,139.75 Confirmed
      2. ~$2,000.00 Outstanding
    2. Conference Expenses
      1. $35,507.00 Confirmed
      2. ~$1,000 Outstanding
    3. Past years: ATI would make $4-5K on each conference
  3. 2025 Budget
    1. Anticipated Income: ~$64,000.00
    2. Anticipated Expenses: ~$95,088.10
  4. The biggest share of our budget goes to Synergos. Here is a mind map showing the tasks that Synergos performs for us:
  5. Data on membership renewal
    1. Additional member data:
    2. Ideas for generating additional revenue:
      1. Certification to be updated & paid for every x years
      2. Charge specific certifications fees- not just membership upon certifying
      3. Cut expenses - Gifts, Postage (sending certificates), Marketing Pilot Project costs
      4. Invest Savings/look into endowments
      5. Increase Donations
      6. Find businesses to sponsor ATI and/or Conference
      7. Find Grants for Research
      8. Move Money from Savings to Checking
    3. Q & A
      1. Do we already have an option to round up membership fees to cover the cost of credit card fees?
      2. At the conference, we talked about approaching well known people who have taken Alexander lessons to film video testimonials, and to possibly ask for donations
      3. Is there still a Revenue Working Group? Answer: That group wrapped was up by Bill Conable when he was treasurer, but we will likely reconvene
      4. It is much easier for Kelsey if we keep donations and member dues separate
      5. Could we have information about new members joining? Answer: We’ve been averaging about 15 new teaching members a year after certifying. In addition, some certified teachers through other organizations have been joining ATI
      6. Question about why there was such a difference between income and expenses on 2 different slides? Answer: one slide is year to date, the other is expected income and expenses through end of year
      7. What will happen to the domain name that was used by the Marketing Pilot Project? Answer: The domain name is only about $4 or 5. The rest of the expense, around $500, was related to other expenses for the Marketing Pilot Project. That project has ended and we don’t anticipate further expenses
      8. From the Membership Committee perspective, we have started to invite trainees to our country meetings. We had 6 trainees come to our meetings, and at least 3 of these trainees are currently participating in the AGM and are volunteering. This year, we are doing better than last year in gaining teaching members.
      9. In one of the country meetings, someone brought up an idea of having an outside business person join as a board member, to bring in outside expertise
      10. Do we have ideas about why members are not renewing? Answer: biggest reasons are cost, people are no longer teaching. Some people are retiring, and some are switching to other careers
      11. At the end of Sept, Julie Mulvihill sent a proposal to the Board about income from the ExChange - selling ads and selling subscriptions to non-ATI members. Hope the Board will consider these proposals (this is on the Board’s agenda for today’s Board meeting)
      12. If there are a significant number of members who are retiring or changing careers, could there be a less expensive membership tier that we could offer them? Response: we do have a lower cost member tier for retired members.
      13. We need to work more on expanding the benefits that we offer our members. Maybe the new generation can offer some ideas about new member benefits we could offer.
      14. Suggestion to offer programs for non-ATI teachers, such as supporting teachers in their outreach initiatives.
      15. Raising dues will be counterproductive because we will lose more members.
      16. As a nonprofit, we can ask for donations.
      17. Regarding ideas to bring a business voice on the board. In the US there is a program called SCORE that offers business mentorship.
      18. Regarding lapsed members - send them a paper form with options for how to renew their membership without going online
    4.  APC would love to hear about pasting links instead of the full text in the chat. Please comment on Basecamp

Day 2 Meeting Evaluation

  • Thank you to APC for doing all the work behind the scenes, especially the people who have to get up at 5:00 am.
  • I really appreciated Liz’s facilitation. It felt calm rather than cumbersome
  • Appreciate the patience that has been exhibited at this meeting. The FC process can feel tedious, but the work is getting done and the pacing is good
  • Thanks to Jennifer for her calm and authoritative presence. It is reassuring and your work this year is lovely.
  • My motto: just show up. People have shown up in all these different time zones. When we show up things get done. Kelsey is amazing with her mind-reading and ability to be on top of everything
  • When you raise your hand if your video is off, you don’t appear in the queue.
  • Gratefulness and appreciation
  • Grateful for the Light & Livelies - they make these meetings tolerable
  • Further evaluations may be added to the Basecamp thread

Seeing Each Other

Meeting Adjourned


 

Day 3: Saturday, November 15 2025

  • Ariel Weiss led a welcoming Light & Lively.
  • Cathy Madden read the Virtual Meeting Guidelines.
  • Gabriele Breuninger read the Meeting Intentions in German.

The following agenda was consented to:

Agenda AGM #3

Caption/Transcription Instructions  3 min
Welcome/Seeing Each Other  3 min
Virtual Meeting Guidelines  1 min
Meeting Intentions  5 min
Present & Consent to Agenda  5 min
Formal Consensus Roles  7 min
Membership and International Committees Proposal Level 3: Resolving Concerns: Presentation  20 min
Light & Lively  2 min
Level 3: Resolving concerns continued  20 min
Screen Break  5 min
Level 3: Resolving Concerns continued  15 min
APC Pre-Break Announcements  3 min
Break 30 min
Level 3: Resolving Concerns  20 min
Announcements  5 min
Vision Mission Values Report  10 min
Light & Lively  3 min
Membership Committee - renewals  10 min
Agenda Planning Committee Ending Announcements  2 min
Meeting Evaluation  5 min
Seeing Each Other  1 min

 

Formal Consensus Roles

  • Agenda Planner: Marilou Chacey, Catherine Kettrick
  • Notetaker: Rachel Prabhakar (from the recordings)
  • Meeting Intentions: Manuelle Borgel
  • Facilitator Part 1: Corinne Cassini
  • Facilitator P1 Asst: Cathy Madden
  • Facilitator Part 2: Gaby Minnes Brandes
  • Doorkeeper: Belinda Mello
  • Public Scribe 1:
    • Part 1:Dianne Sales
    • Part 2: Diana Bradley
  • Public Scribe 2: Judith Saxton
  • Peacekeeper: Teresa Lee
  • Advocate: Sara Goldstein
  • Teach Advocate: Kelsey Gomez-Morrissey
  • Language Advocate: Rosa Luisa Rossi
  • FC Advocate: Debi Adams
  • Light & Lively, hello: Manuelle Borgel
  • Light & Lively 1: Morgan Brunketurner
  • Light & Lively 2: Ariel Weiss
  • Timekeeper: Amy Hack

Merger of International and Membership Committees

Presentation of expanded rationale, and resolving concerns. For more details, see the section at the beginning of this document.

Board update about 2026 membership dues

In the interest of being fiscally responsible, the board has voted to set the 2026 dues as follows:

  • Early bird dues, paid by Jan 12, 2026. Regular dues deadline: March 15, 2026
  • Teaching members:
    • Tier 1 Early bird: $225, Regular, $250
    • Tier 2 Early bird: $184, Regular, $200
    • Tier 3 Early bird: $128, Regular $145
  • General members: $135
  • Retired members: $135
  • Trainee members: no required dues, donations appreciated
  • ATI is working on setting up an automatic dues renewal option. Members will be able to opt into this system during the 2026 dues payment process, and the automatic renewal will begin in January 2027.

Vision Mission Working Group Poll Results

  • Values: 1. Inclusion 2. Kindness 3. Respect 4. Honesty 5. Integrity 6. Curiosity 7. Flexibility (33 people responded)
  • All respondents agreed that they shared the values listed
  • In response to the question: “Is this a value you want ATI to embody?”, 30 people responded yes. 2 responded no to kindness, and 1 to honesty
  • Question 3 asked, “Do you have concerns about how we described these values?” Responses were as follows: 

Value

No

Yes

Inclusion

30

3

Kindness

31

2

Respect

29

4

Honesty

30

3

Integrity

29

4

Curiosity

28

5

Flexibility

29

4

  • After the meeting, there was a breakout room to discuss the poll. If people have further concerns about how values were defined, please email Catherine Kettrick.
  • Question 4 asked: “Any values you want to add?” Responses as follows:
    • Collaboration or participation, collective
    • Rigor: we seek to embody and practice our values and the principles of the AT to the best of our abilities, with a hope of making deep connections and discovering new insights.
    • Balance: this may fall under flexibility, but the need to discern & balance vs. blurting “Honesty”. It may be honest to say something, but it isn't necessary to be hurtful.
    • Seeing “Inclusion” in the list, I am wondering about “Diversity” and “Equity”. I’m curious why they aren’t included. Include AT principles like “psycho-physical unity”/”wholeness” and “inhibition”?
    • Add the value of Commitment/perseverance
    • Excellence: in the teaching and practice of the work/principles of FMA
    • Ethical conduct as part of Integrity
    • Could we add open-mindedness to flexibility?
    • Patience
    • Efficiency. We value people’s time and strive to respect the use of it.
    • As feedback to Kindness, we also practice kindness by our actions to others and ourselves
    • I recommend having a look at the Adlerian definition of respect, central to equality, inclusion. Includes respect for self and others
  • The poll will be revised and sent out again next year.

Membership Committee Update: Membership renewal process

  • To renew with early bird dues rates, please renew by Jan 12, 2026
  • Context: by March 15, 2025 we had 100 members who had not yet renewed. With help from Ashley Adams and the International Committee, we contacted those members individually. Many of them had forgotten to renew their membership.
  • ATI is working to set up automatic renewals, so that people can opt in to have their membership automatically renew.

Day 3 Meeting Evalutions

  • Frustrated that we did not follow our peacekeeper's suggestion at the end of part 1 of the meeting
  • Concerned we didn't fill all the Formal Consensus roles for tomorrow's meeting, and that one person who volunteered was not permitted to fulfill that role
  • Wishes to honor Corinne's facilitation and Cathy's assistance. Would have liked clarity on clarifying questions and resolving concerns. Some confusion with process and slides.
  • Celebrate the merger of Membership and International Committees
  • Thank you to the Agenda Planning committee for all the behind-the-scenes work and to Kelsey for all the work she does with docs, slides and chat.
  • Interested that Concerns were stated re proposal NOT going through.
  • Thank you to Cathy for being a great support to new facilitators
  • Thank you all for the amount of work everyone is doing. Meetings are getting better and better in terms of clarity people are bringing to our process/evolving organization
  • Appreciate being able to hear other languages and have translations below.
  • Congratulate us for decision we came to consensus on - IC joined and becomes MC
  • Wish for facilitators to get agenda with names as early as possible.
  • Interesting {yet frustrating} Formal Consensus process
  • Thank you Rosa Luisa for volunteering to chair the newly named Membership committee.
  • While celebrating transcription in the chat, as a public scribe it is challenging.
  • Being able to speak in one’s own language offers full agency and embodiment of ideas.
  • Scribe can ask speaker to write their comment in chat and then it can be translated.
  • Despite some confusion about the formal consensus process, it allows us to see how effective the FC process is. Congratulations.
  • Self-reflecting that facilitator was confused re Part 2 of Agenda, Resolving Concerns. Appreciated Peacekeeper's invitation to pause. Confusion re what we were resolving.
  • Admire FC and its process and the guidelines, step by step. I have learned how to write a proposal and make it clear at all levels. Thank you to everybody for saying yes to the merger of committees.
  • Translation was not always excellent, but better than nothing.
  • We did really well on the time. Thank you to timekeeper
  • Thank you to Agenda Planning and Marilou for a clear, well planned and timed agenda

 Seeing Each Other

Meeting Adjourned


Day 4: Sunday, November 16 2025 


Agenda AGM #4

Caption Instruction Video  3 min
こんにちは Kon'nichiwa/Seeing Each Other 3 min
Meeting Intentions  5 min
Present & Consent to Agenda  5 min
Formal Consensus Roles  7 min
Nominations Committee: Presentation of Revised Proposal & Clarifying Questions  20 min
Light & Lively 3 min
Nominations Committee Level II: Raising Concerns Revised Proposal 15 min
Screen Break  5 min
Nominations Committee Level III: Resolving Concerns Revised Proposal 20 min
Time Allowing: Announcements  5 min
APC Pre-Break Announcements  2 min
Break 30 min
If Needed: Announcements  5 min
Continuing Education Committee Sharing  10 min
2026 Conference  3 min
Nominations: Elections Results  12 min
Light & Lively  2 min
2026 AGM dates  3 min
Meeting 4 Evaluations  5 min
All-AGM Evaluations  15 min
Seeing Each Other  1 min

 

The agenda was presented and accepted by unanimous consent

Formal Consensus Roles

  • Agenda Planner: Jennifer Mackerras, Marilou Chacey
  • Notetaker: Rachel Prabhakar (from the recordings)
  • Meeting Intentions: Rosa Luisa Rossi
  •  Facilitator Part 1: Manuelle Borgel
  • Facilitator P1 Asst: Diana Bradley
  • Facilitator Part 2: Gaby Minnes Brandes
  • Doorkeeper: Debi Adams
  • Public Scribe 1:
    • Part 1: Judith Saxton
    • Part 2: Belinda Mello
  • Public Scribe 2: Sara Goldstein
  • Peacekeeper: Belinda Mello
  • Advocate: Sara Goldstein
  • Teach Advocate: Kelsey Gomez-Morrissey
  • Language Advocate: Rosa Luisa Rossi
  • FC Advocate: Cathy Madden
  • Light & Lively, hello: Renee Jackson
  • Light & Lively 1: Morgan Brunketurner
  • Light & Lively 2: Tania Laughton
  • Timekeeper: David Mills

Nominations Committee Proposal

Revised Proposal, level II and level III discussions. Please see the section above for more information

Continuing Education Committee Sharing

Presented by Jana Tift & Teresa Lee

  • Teachers in Continuing Education Group 2 need to file their continuing education reports.
  • ATI’s website provides information about continuing education reporting
  • Kelsey reviewed the process for filing continuing educations reports

Nominations Committee: Election Results

 

  • A glitch in the electronic voting system resulted in votes for Morgan Brunketurner being lost. Request to elect Morgan by consensus at this meeting.
  • Clarifying question: why not redo the election? Answer: it is time consuming, and hard to get people to respond. Furthermore, we need to complete our elections by the end of this AGM
  • Suggestion: vote for Morgan during this meeting, rather than use formal consensus, since other positions are elected through a vote. Resolution: a poll will be made available now, for people present at this meeting to vote
  • The Nominations Committee is happy to report the following candidates were elected:
  • Board Co-Chair - Jilla Roberts, 1st term, 1st year
  • Board Secretary - Joy Lamberton Arcolano, 1st term, 1st year 
  • Executive Director #2 - Sara Goldstein, 1st term, 1st year
  • Executive Director #3 - Judith Saxton, 1st term, 1st year
  • Communications Committee Chair: Harold Rivas, 1st term, 1st year
  • Membership Committee Chair: Rosa Luisa Rossi, 1st term, 1st year
  • Certification Coordinating Committee Co-Chair: Belinda Mello, 1st term, 1st year
  • Continuing Education Committee, Chair: Petrea Warneck, 1st term, 1st year
  • Professional Development Committee Chair: Eric S. Kildow, 1st term, 1st year
  • Ethics Advisory Committee - Member: Harry Hobbs, 1st term, 1st year
  • Formal Consensus Planning Committee Co-Chairs: currently unfilled
  • Nominations Committee Co-Chair: Morgan Brunketurner, 1st term, 1st year
  • Site Committee Chair: Teresa Lee, 2nd term, 1st year

2026 Conference Dates & Location

17-21 October 2026 at the Akademie Gesundes Leben in Germany, near Frankfurt

2026 AGM Dates

 September 26 & 27 and October 3 & 4 2026

Meeting 4 Evaluations

  • Thank you to Manuelle. So surprised and pleased that you did it in French, and captions worked so well with translations. You did it so well. You are a model.

  • Manuelle did an amazing job and loved the languages - we learned so much
  • Thank you to all the incredible work of those who planned everything. And for the support for all those who are part of this organization.
  • Appreciation for the clarity of the Nominations Proposal and the clear expression of the rationale, and the work of resolving the concerns
  • I take my hat off to Kelsey, the sorceress! Stuff happens so quickly!
  • Appreciation for referring to our bylaws and procedures. Would like to see these brought in earlier in the process, so we can refer to them as we make decision
  • It can be frustrating in our process when we are not sure where we are and how what we are doing fits in. We are doing a great job of being patient and perseverant and sticking to our process and getting good results.

All-AGM (All 4 Meetings) Evaluations

  • Thanks to all the brave people who did new things!
  • Thank you again to APC for all the work behind the scenes, and to Kelsey for all the extra work on the slides. For everybody caring so much about our organization. Great to see FC process.
  • Could we have the awards during the business meetings? Volunteers who work so hard should be acknowledged
  • Noticed that the captions during this meeting got worse when we speak too quickly. Translation shows up at a delay, so we need to pause more often.
  • Bravo to everyone! A lot of work and a lot to get done. Special shout out to Kelsey for getting time off to spend Sat. morning with us. And Marilou, you are a great tutor! Join APC!
  • Having been at many meetings, grateful that we can pass two proposals in one year! We are maturing!
  • Old guard - and to all who show up all the time. Thank you for doing the work, being willing and picking up slack and everything you do.
  • Considering that Sunday morning is sacred time for some members: Can we consider Friday and Saturday instead?
  • Astonishment and pleasure at all the new tools that are available to us (poll and vote). Excited to see new and young names coming into chair positions.
  • Appreciation for having the meeting intentions and everything read in languages other than English. Appreciation of the experience of Manuelle facilitating in French, so that more of us can experience what it's like to use captions.
  • Could we change time for one of the weekends so members in Asia have more time to attend?
  • Thank you to Tanya for preparing the Membership and International Committee merger proposal.
  • These meetings "fill my batteries to the top." Fully ready to take on responsibilities.
  • Helpful to post links to documents we are discussing. It may not be easy for everyone to move back and forth between tabs, so it was very helpful to see them on screen share - thank you.
  • Thank you from the board co-chair as she completes her term.
  • Saturday mornings are sacred for some as well.
  • ATI is over 30 years old. It is very moving to experience the commitment people have given to ATI. Appreciation for Manuelle's leadership. Marveling at the sustained level of commitment from our members.
  • Acknowledging benefit of being able to voice concerns. They strengthen the outcome in this process. Not a criticism, no need to be defended.

Seeing each other

Meeting Adjourned